<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minimum peer threshold support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bgpmon.net/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=88" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=88</link>
	<description>BGPmon.net BLOG</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:46:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did AS13214 really hijack the Internet? &#124; BGPmon.net Blog</title>
		<link>http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=88&#038;cpage=1#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Did AS13214 really hijack the Internet? &#124; BGPmon.net Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=88#comment-308</guid>
		<description>[...] This again shows that it’s hard to determine if an event is a ‘real’ hijack or not. Some will say it’s irrelevant some want to be notified in all cases. Based on received feedback regarding the November 11 event, BGPmon.net implemented peer thresholds. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This again shows that it’s hard to determine if an event is a ‘real’ hijack or not. Some will say it’s irrelevant some want to be notified in all cases. Based on received feedback regarding the November 11 event, BGPmon.net implemented peer thresholds. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=88&#038;cpage=1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=88#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Thanks for adding this!  This feature could be improved in several ways:
a) an assessment of the scope could be by the number or percentage of worldwide netblocks represented by the AS that&#039;s advertising the &quot;hijacked&quot; space.  If it&#039;s just 1% of all space, perhaps it&#039;s not that relevant to the BGPMon subscriber&#039;s customer base.
b) the first point could be refined or tweaked by counting the number of ASNs or netblocks that are hijacked per RIR.  If it&#039;s hijacked by one in AfriNIC it&#039;s not as critical, but it&#039;s hijacked in ARIN space that&#039;s more relevant to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for adding this!  This feature could be improved in several ways:<br />
a) an assessment of the scope could be by the number or percentage of worldwide netblocks represented by the AS that&#8217;s advertising the &#8220;hijacked&#8221; space.  If it&#8217;s just 1% of all space, perhaps it&#8217;s not that relevant to the BGPMon subscriber&#8217;s customer base.<br />
b) the first point could be refined or tweaked by counting the number of ASNs or netblocks that are hijacked per RIR.  If it&#8217;s hijacked by one in AfriNIC it&#8217;s not as critical, but it&#8217;s hijacked in ARIN space that&#8217;s more relevant to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
