Comments on: Issues with allocating from 1.0.0.0/8 http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275 BGPmon.net BLOG Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:46:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Nova Kuzemchak http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-1042 Nova Kuzemchak Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:40:48 +0000 http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275#comment-1042 Submit articles is great for seo. Many web owner writes articles for their better rank. Submit articles is great for seo. Many web owner writes articles for their better rank.

]]> By: christian louboutin http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-731 christian louboutin Sat, 06 Mar 2010 06:03:58 +0000 http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275#comment-731 it is interesting and informative article. This has been very helpful understanding a lot of things. I'm sure a lot of other people will agree with me. it is interesting and informative article. This has been very helpful understanding a lot

of things. I’m sure a lot of other people will agree with me.

]]> By: Twee /8-blokken naar ARIN, acht over in de vrije pool | ISPam.nl http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-719 Twee /8-blokken naar ARIN, acht over in de vrije pool | ISPam.nl Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:04:46 +0000 http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275#comment-719 [...] die het IP-adres 1.1.1.1 gebruikt in haar draadloze netwerkapparatuur? Een complete lijst is op BGPmon te [...] [...] die het IP-adres 1.1.1.1 gebruikt in haar draadloze netwerkapparatuur? Een complete lijst is op BGPmon te [...]

]]> By: Difference Operator » IPv6 in arrivo? http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-548 Difference Operator » IPv6 in arrivo? Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:15:31 +0000 http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275#comment-548 [...] essere i problemi dovuti alla registrazione ed assegnazione del blocco di indirizzi 1.0.0.0/8: http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275. Allora a quando il passaggio ai 128 [...] [...] essere i problemi dovuti alla registrazione ed assegnazione del blocco di indirizzi 1.0.0.0/8: http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275. Allora a quando il passaggio ai 128 [...]

]]> By: Nico http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-526 Nico Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:56:39 +0000 http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275#comment-526 For AnoNet, there are people who want to renumber under a ULA's range. I hope it what will happen ... For AnoNet, there are people who want to renumber under a ULA’s range.
I hope it what will happen …

]]> By: andree http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-523 andree Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:54:42 +0000 http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275#comment-523 Hi James, For a detailed list of all announcements see: http://bgpmon.net/showbogons.php?inet=4&private=no&global=no Just search for "1." The most recent announcement was: 1.1.1.0/24 origin AS8218 date: 2010-01-15 Hi James,

For a detailed list of all announcements see:
http://bgpmon.net/showbogons.php?inet=4&private=no&global=no

Just search for “1.”
The most recent announcement was:
1.1.1.0/24 origin AS8218 date: 2010-01-15

]]> By: Mysidia (James Hess) http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-522 Mysidia (James Hess) Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:17:40 +0000 http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275#comment-522 Interesting and scary. I didn't imagine there would be _that_ many BGP route leaks of unofficially used 1.x.x.x space. APNIC might want to refrain from allocating 1.1.1.0/24 for a long time, based on that. Still 9 months is a long time. I wonder about the time spread, and if there were any in say the past few months. Interesting and scary. I didn’t imagine there would be _that_ many BGP route leaks of unofficially used 1.x.x.x space.

APNIC might want to refrain from allocating 1.1.1.0/24 for a long time, based on that.

Still 9 months is a long time. I wonder about the time spread, and if there were any in say the past few months.

]]> By: somic http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-521 somic Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:19:22 +0000 http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275#comment-521 FWIW, RFC 3330 allocates 192.0.2.0/24 to be used in documentation. FWIW, RFC 3330 allocates 192.0.2.0/24 to be used in documentation.

]]> By: 1.0.0.0/8 被分配給 APNIC 了… at Gea-Suan Lin’s BLOG http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-520 1.0.0.0/8 被分配給 APNIC 了… at Gea-Suan Lin’s BLOG Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:37:27 +0000 http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275#comment-520 [...] IP address 被放出來，在實際使用之前還是有不少問題要處理，像是「Issues with allocating from 1.0.0.0/8」這篇所提到的，目前有很多人佔用這段 IP address 並且亂放 [...] [...] IP address 被放出來，在實際使用之前還是有不少問題要處理，像是「Issues with allocating from 1.0.0.0/8」這篇所提到的，目前有很多人佔用這段 IP address 並且亂放 [...]

]]> By: IPv4 Free Pool Drops Below 10%, 1.0.0.0/8 Allocated | JetLib News http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-519 IPv4 Free Pool Drops Below 10%, 1.0.0.0/8 Allocated | JetLib News Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:20:13 +0000 http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=275#comment-519 [...] intranet use any unofficial address ranges for private networks?” Reader dude_nl sends in a summary of the issues with allocating from 1.0.0.0/8 from the BGPmon.net blog. “As Alain Durand mentioned on Nanog: ‘Who said the water at [...] [...] intranet use any unofficial address ranges for private networks?” Reader dude_nl sends in a summary of the issues with allocating from 1.0.0.0/8 from the BGPmon.net blog. “As Alain Durand mentioned on Nanog: ‘Who said the water at [...]

]]>