<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Routing diff report, Rancid for BGP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bgpmon.net/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=257</link>
	<description>BGPmon.net BLOG</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:46:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=257&#038;cpage=1#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=257#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your help.  That answers the question perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your help.  That answers the question perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andree</title>
		<link>http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=257&#038;cpage=1#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>Andree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=257#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>Hi Adam,

Good to hear that you find this tool useful.

“(No valid route object!)” means that no route object was found for the announced prefix. It&#039;s good practice to have route objects for all your prefixes in one the IRR&#039;s.

With valid we mean: an Exact match, ie, same prefix and same prefix length and same origin AS. 

This would be a valid route object for 145.88.0.0/15 announced by AS1103


&lt;code&gt;whois -h whois.radb.net 145.88.0.0/15
route:	      145.88.0.0/15
descr:	      LUMC-NET HVUNET
origin:	      AS1103
notify:	      info@surfnet.nl
mnt-by:	      AS1103-MNT
changed:      peter.vons@sara.nl	20020227
source:	      RIPE&lt;/code&gt;

Hope that answers your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam,</p>
<p>Good to hear that you find this tool useful.</p>
<p>“(No valid route object!)” means that no route object was found for the announced prefix. It&#8217;s good practice to have route objects for all your prefixes in one the IRR&#8217;s.</p>
<p>With valid we mean: an Exact match, ie, same prefix and same prefix length and same origin AS. </p>
<p>This would be a valid route object for 145.88.0.0/15 announced by AS1103</p>
<p><code>whois -h whois.radb.net 145.88.0.0/15<br />
route:	      145.88.0.0/15<br />
descr:	      LUMC-NET HVUNET<br />
origin:	      AS1103<br />
notify:	      <a href="mailto:info@surfnet.nl">info@surfnet.nl</a><br />
mnt-by:	      AS1103-MNT<br />
changed:      <a href="mailto:peter.vons@sara.nl">peter.vons@sara.nl</a>	20020227<br />
source:	      RIPE</code></p>
<p>Hope that answers your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=257&#038;cpage=1#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bgpmon.net/blog/?p=257#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>What does &quot;(No valid route object!)&quot; mean after an announced prefix?  All of my routes are reachable so I&#039;m not understanding this one.  

Thanks so much for this site/tools.  It has been a huge help for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does &#8220;(No valid route object!)&#8221; mean after an announced prefix?  All of my routes are reachable so I&#8217;m not understanding this one.  </p>
<p>Thanks so much for this site/tools.  It has been a huge help for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
